Exact(4)
The number of probes is vast with some datasets containing more than 54,000, so to reduce our significant genes to a manageable list per dataset we used a stringent cut off criteria where a gene was labelled as significantly differentially expressed if the t-test returned a p value of less than 0.001.
Binomial proportions test was used applying a stringent cut off of P <= 0.0001 in order to eliminate potential erroneous inferences due to small sample sizes.
Using a stringent cut off at false discovery rate (FDR) = 0.05 that corresponds to a p-value of 0.001, 9,138 genes (43.9%) were identified to be statistically significant expressed in mycelium and appressorium tissues.
Since EST evidence covers three quarters of the predicted Ciona genes, we also identified EST matches for the 169 putative GPCRs using TBLASTN with a stringent cut off E-value of 1e-15.
Similar(56)
Only interactions fulfilling a stringent cut-off criterion were used in order to ensure high data quality.
In our method, we do not use a stringent cut-off value to determine target gene sets for miRNAs.
The number of such genes is extremely high, even if a stringent cut-off of 5× corrected background is used (Table 4).
In one set of analyses we used a stringent cut-off, defining eQTLs as only those that had a p-value in the top 20,000.
A very conservative threshold was chosen to have a stringent cut-off and exclude non-LCRs.
A stringent cut-off for CK-19 RGE positivity has therefore been set in this study.
An e-value of 10-30 or less was used as a stringent cut-off for homology.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com