a striking void of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a striking void of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a noticeable absence or emptiness in a particular context, often emphasizing the impact of that absence. Example: "The artist's latest work is a striking void of color, leaving the viewer with a sense of desolation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Formal & Business

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Reference

Social Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

A spokesman for NATO said "a great deal of time and patience" was used to ensure that the strike occurred in a remote area void of civilians.

The New York Times

Melancholy is "the sensation of a void of knowledge or an awareness of a void of sensation".

The New York Times - Books

But he leaves a void of personality, a void of vocal agility.

The Guardian - Music

"There's a big void of data right now.

Johns Hopkins University

2) A barbarian, void of refinement.

Vice

It was a world void of emotion, goodwill or kindness.

Los Angeles Times

Paul has lived a life void of closeness and intimacy.

Huffington Post

"There's a void of kindness in New York City, and there's a void of people who want to serve.

Huffington Post

It was a void of gods.

The Guardian - Books

It was a void of animals.

The Guardian - Books

Below, a void of bottomless water.

The Guardian - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "a striking void of", ensure the context provides a clear point of comparison or expectation to highlight the significance of the absence. For example, "The performance was a striking void of emotion, especially considering the actor's previous roles."

Common error

Avoid using "a striking void of" in contexts where a simple lack would suffice. The phrase implies a significant or unexpected absence, not just a minor deficiency.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a striking void of" functions as a modifier, typically describing a noun. It highlights a significant absence or lack, making the absence itself a notable characteristic. This is supported by Ludwig, which confirms its usability in English.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "a striking void of" is a grammatically correct construction used to emphasize a significant absence. Ludwig confirms its validity in English. However, it's usage is infrequent according to the analyzed data, indicating that while correct, it may not be the most common way to express this idea. Consider it as a tool to highlight something that is unexpectedly or noticeably missing. Related phrases like "a profound absence of" and "a notable lack of" offer semantically similar alternatives. When using this phrase, consider if a simpler term would suffice, as "a striking void of" carries a stronger emphasis and should be used when that intensity is warranted.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a profound absence of

Uses "profound" to intensify the sense of absence, suggesting it is deep or significant.

a noticeable absence of

Replaces "striking void" with "noticeable absence", emphasizing the obviousness of the lack.

a marked lack of

Substitutes "striking void" with "marked lack", highlighting the distinctness of the deficiency.

a prominent dearth of

Replaces the more common "void" and "lack" with "dearth", suggesting a scarcity.

a conspicuous absence of

Uses "conspicuous" instead of "striking", emphasizing that the absence is easily seen.

a palpable emptiness of

Replaces "void" with "emptiness", adding a sense of feeling or tangibility to the absence.

a glaring deficiency of

Substitutes "striking void" with "glaring deficiency", implying a fault or inadequacy.

a significant want of

Uses "want" to denote the lack, which may sound more formal or archaic depending on context.

an evident privation of

Replaces "void" with "privation", suggesting a deprivation or loss.

a stark vacuum of

Replaces "void" with "vacuum", which suggests a complete absence, similar to a space devoid of matter.

FAQs

How can I use "a striking void of" in a sentence?

Use "a striking void of" to emphasize a significant absence or lack of something that is expected or needed. For example, "The desert landscape was a striking void of vegetation."

What are some alternatives to "a striking void of"?

You can use alternatives like "a profound absence of", "a notable lack of", or "a significant deficiency of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "a striking void of" or "a profound absence of"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "a profound absence of" might be preferable when emphasizing the depth or significance of the absence, while "a striking void of" highlights the surprising or noticeable nature of the absence.

What does "a striking void of" imply?

The phrase implies that there is a noticeable and significant absence of something. The use of "striking" suggests that the absence is unexpected or particularly noticeable.