The phrase "a striking difference was found" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where a notable or significant difference has been identified or observed in a study, analysis, or comparison.
Example: "In the research, a striking difference was found between the two groups in terms of their response to the treatment."
Alternatives: "a significant difference was observed" or "a notable difference was detected."
However, a striking difference was found in the temporal correlations between the activity in motor and sensory zones, which essentially behaved independently, as in the deafferentated spinal cord in vivo, and the mere correlations, when expressed, were inverted from a motor to sensory lead in vivo to a sensory to motor lead in vitro (see also Bos et al.34).34
Interestingly, a striking difference was found in the numbers of chemotaxis genes.
Further, a striking difference was found between controls and MPEP-treated animals with regard to responses in the gamma frequency band to HFT.
Although there were a lot of similarities, a striking difference was found regarding the perception of patients' self-management between healthcare professionals and patients.
Overall 48-hour mortality was 9.5% and most deaths occurred within 24 hours, but a striking difference was found between the control group and the bolus fluid groups: 48-hour mortality rates were 7.3%, 10.6%, and 10.5% for the control, albumin bolus, and 0.9% bolus groups, respectively.
When comparing databases of sensory and developmental transcription networks, a striking difference is found in the distribution of cascade lengths.
The most striking difference was found in the level of detail included in the open-source database as compared to official data.
Moreover, striking difference was found in the expression of X-linked G6pdx gene, the parental gene of the autosomal retrogene G6pd2.
The most striking difference was found in the UTR category, where the fractions of UTR in the primate and rodent-specific HCNSs were 3 times and 5.5 times higher than those of human and mouse genomes, respectively.
In those two studies, the most striking difference was found in the German analysis that determined the IGRA-only strategy for contacts to be the most cost-effective, applying different progression rates for TST and IGRA based on observed progression rates in Germany [ 8].
Striking differences were found between foetal and adult liver: the former showed a very low reactivity for Tβ4 while in the adult we observed a strong reactivity in the vast majority of the hepatocytes.
