Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
In other words, for every condition C which excludes a finite list of such factors the completed law "All birds satisfying C can fly" will still have to face further exceptions hence, a strict completion of this law is impossible.
Since one can only speak of a strict completion of "normally L" if (a) and (b) hold, it follows that the ranking-of-worlds account does in fact not entail the possibility of a strict completion.
In other words, a definite exclusive cp-law "exclusively cp, if A(d), then B(d)" has a strict completion of the form "For all d: if A(d) and C d), then B(d)", where the completing condition "C d)" excludes the presence of the specified disturbing factors in application d.
Similar(56)
Since the normal conditions "N" express the proposition that the given situation or world is normal, it would seem that the ranking-of-worlds account entails the possibility of a strict completion by adding the normality condition N to the antecedent: "if N, then Y = f(X)".
This result is adequate, because as have argued above, in most cases (especially in all non-deterministic situations) a strict completion is impossible.
It is a widely agreed in philosophy that the real significance of exclusive cp-laws lies in situations where strict completion is impossible (for example, cf. Rescher 1994, 14; Pietroski & Rey 1995, 84, 102; Horgan & Tienson 1996, 119f).
On the one hand, Waterfall and Spiral models use the strict sequential completion of phases, setting as a necessary condition to proceed into a next phase, the completion of the previous one.
The reconstructions of exclusive cp-laws in terms of strict completions do not imply anything about the probability with which undisturbed antecedent-events will produce the consequent (cf. Pietroski and Rey 1995, p. 84; Schiffer 1991, p. 8).
There is a strict code of confidentiality.
There's a strict process of approval.
This has resulted in a strict regimen of circumspect silence.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com