The phrase "a stipulation is" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when defining or explaining a specific condition or requirement in a legal or formal context.
Example: "A stipulation is a condition that must be met in order for an agreement to be valid."
Alternatives: "a provision is" or "a requirement is".
Such a stipulation is not only poorly considered but simply not practicable, which was probably obvious from the outset.
Such a stipulation is not required under Dutch law, permitting an acquirer to take "creeping" control of a company by acquiring shares on the open market without issuing an offer to all shareholders.
But, as Karttunen himself realized, such a stipulation is unmotivated.
The problem with such a stipulation is self-evident, but becomes even more so when the Dietary Guidelines for Americans are brought into the mix.
Furthermore, when he retired a stipulation was placed in his contract that would forbid him from returning to play for the Nets.
Twenty-four witestifiedesthated that, in their opinions, petitioner could get a fair trial and a stipulation was entered that five more witnesses would testify that he could get a fair trial in the parish.
Such a stipulation was given when the grant under consideration in the case cited was made, showing that the government intended the grant to take effect notwithstanding any existing right of occupancy by the Indians, and it was deemed a sufficient expression of its intention to that effect.
But the existence of the condition upon which a review is allowed is sufficiently shown by a statement, in the finding of facts by the court, or in the bill of exceptions, or in the record of the judgment entry, such a stipulation was made in writing.
A stipulation was thereupon entered into that the defendants should forthwith file their answers to the bills; that replications thereto should be immediately filed; and that the cases thus put at issue should be heard on final hearing, upon the pleadings, proofs, master's report, and exhibits, without further testimony from either party.
A stipulation was placed that Benoit had to win the match by submission, as Kane could've won by pinfall, submission, disqualification or countout.
In 1799, a stipulation was added that the governor would not personally lead troops on the battlefield unless advised to do so by a resolution of the General Assembly.
