Sentence examples for a statistically significant proportion from inspiring English sources

The six experimental animals left the room with a tool 70% of the time, and the choice of a correct tool, compared with an unsuitable tool, was made a statistically significant proportion of the time.

In contrast, local spatial organization was found for all 9 maps (Table 2), i.e., a statistically significant proportion of polygons had sufficient numbers of neighboring sites with similar values (Fig. 6, polygons with significant parameter clustering or neighborhood similarity, p<0.05, are marked by white and black dots).

A statistically significant proportion of AFP cases in Bangladesh appear to be caused by GBS.

Interestingly, all the candidate drivers shared a statistically significant proportion of transcriptomic neighbors.

A statistically significant proportion (26%) of Asian patients were not aware that friends or family members could come to the consultation (Fisher's exact test: P=0.04).

Interestingly, a statistically significant proportion of genes shown to be differentially expressed mapped to chromosomes described to be recurrently altered in NBTs, chromosomes 1 and 17 [ 17].

Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that age accounted for a small but statistically significant proportion of the variance in clinical change, such that the older the individual, the smaller the postinjection improvement.

Results from the classification of depressive symptoms according to the ICD-10 criteria indicate an increase with age and a higher, but not statistically significant, proportion in females and a higher proportion based on self-report.

A greater (although not statistically significant) proportion of elderly patients (35%) had a dose reduction along the first four cycles, in comparison with the middle-aged (25%), and younger patients (19%).

In a subgroup analysis of those cases where abnormal FHR was detected, there was a higher though not statistically significant proportion of deaths in the Doppler versus Pinard arm (4/71 (5.3%) vs 1/45 (2.2%), IRR=2.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 21.47).

This was due to a somewhat higher (0.24 ± 0.27) but statistically significant proportion of heroin-positive urine samples from patients in group 1 and period 1 versus patients in group 2 and period 1 (10.15 ± 0.24; P = 0.0352); no significant differences were found in period 2 (group 1: 0.15 ± 0.23, group 2: 0.17 ± 0.25; P = 0.6734).