The phrase "a statistically significant further" is not correct in written English as it is incomplete and lacks clarity.
It could be used in a context where you are discussing the results of a statistical analysis, but it needs to be rephrased for clarity.
Example: "The study found a statistically significant further increase in the results after the intervention."
Alternatives: "a statistically significant additional" or "a statistically significant increase in".
Whilst this may be statistically significant, further work is required to establish if this has any clinical significance within a user population.
However, our data did not reveal statistically significant further increase of incident malignancy in children with JIA after a mean (SD) duration of exposure of 2.97 (2.82) years to methotrexate and/or 3.05 (1.75) years to TNF-alpha inhibitors.
This result was not statistically significant; further, there was only one study from the seventies including 19 patients, and one aberrant study with a very low response rate including 11 patients.
Whilst our results were statistically significant, further research is warranted to define parameters to determine clinically meaningful change in clinician behaviour in relation to bowel management.
Although we observed a single CAPs-exposed female that appeared to have enlarged lateral ventricles at PND14, the effects were not statistically significant, further suggesting male specificity of the lateral ventricle dilation.
Although adjustment for age and gender reduced the estimated association, it remained potentially clinically significant even though not statistically significant; further data may clarify this association and address whether changes in mindfulness with training enhance PNS recovery from stress.
As with traditional publication bias, the tendency is to analyze data and choose to present results which are statistically significant, further from the null, or closer to what the researchers believe is the true value.
For proton pump inhibitors and antipsychotics, the impact was increased over the 20 month follow-up period as evidenced by the statistically significant further reduction in the trends post intervention compared to pre-intervention trends (Table 3).
In contrast to the mutS strain, the mutS dinB double mutant (UBPA100) displayed a statistically significant ∼2.3-fold further increase in the frequency of UV-induced mutagenesis (Fig. 4A).
Additionally, STAT3 rshowed6 showed a statistically significant association in further logistic regression analysis.
