Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
Remarkably, animals subjected to damage induced with glycerol and receiving an intrarenal hAFSC injection demonstrated no increase in the levels of creatinine or BUN during the expected acute phase of injury, showing a statistically significant difference when compared with animals treated with PBS after ATN or with animals that underwent only ATN induction.
However, neither of these treatments exhibited a statistically significant difference when compared with the P treatment (5.2 ± 3.6 × 10 sperm/ml of urine).
This was a statistically significant difference when compared with both the 2 and 0.5 cm nodule scenarios regardless of the timing of the resection or the response to chemotherapy (Fig. 3).
The MP treatment group showed a sperm concentration that was significantly higher than that in the AP treatment group (P < 0.05), but neither group exhibited a statistically significant difference when compared with the P treatment group (P > 0.05).
a Statistically significant difference when compared with other collection periods (P < 0.05).
Similar(55)
Statistically significant difference when compared with all other methods over fivefolds using t-test at the 5% significance level is denoted by a.
The patients receiving all elements of the intervention showed no statistically significant difference when compared with the control group (mean difference in primary outcome of −4.43 (−9.7 to 0.8)).
The cell numbers on all LDPE samples showed no statistically significant differences, when compared with each other).
There was no statistically significant difference when comparing the two groups at any time point.
All the STMCs, with inhibitory activities above 80%, exhibited statistically significant differences when compared to the treatments with individual transition-metal salts (p < 0.05).
The CF-Pearson and CF-Cosine techniques have poor accuracy (with statistically significant differences when compared to all other techniques).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com