The phrase "a statistically significant difference in favour" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as research, statistics, or scientific studies when discussing the results of an analysis that shows a meaningful difference favoring one group or condition over another.
Example: "The study revealed a statistically significant difference in favour of the new treatment compared to the standard one."
Alternatives: "a meaningful difference favoring" or "a significant advantage for".
The results showed a statistically significant difference in favour of the EG after CL treatment.
In our case a statistically significant difference in favour of acupuncture was found for the primary outcome measure – a questionnaire called MYMOP that measures a change in individualised health status – and for the wellbeing questionnaire.
From these seven more or less comparable RCTs on intravenous volume expansion, four show a statistically significant difference in favour of NaHCO3.
There was a statistically significant difference in favour of lithium (relative risk (RR) fixed effect 0.34, 95% Cl 0.14 0.82) which was significantly superior to antidepressants in preventing relapses that required admission to hospital.
When comparing axial loads to loosening in grub screw constructs secured with a 5-Nm torque and those on the bolt constructs secured without torque control, there was a statistically significant difference in favour of bolt constructs (Mann–Whitney U test, p < 0.05).
Meta-analysis resulted in a statistically significant difference in favour of EGb 761 (SMD −0.44; 95% CI −0.68, −0.19; P<0.001, n=7).
However, a statistically significant difference in radial deviation in favour of the no repair group was found (Table 3).
Finkemeier et al. [2] found a statistically significant difference in union time in favour of reamed nails during the first 4 postoperative months.
Atomoxetine and OROS MPH both produced robust improvements in symptoms in patients with ADHD; however, there was a statistically significant difference in efficacy (response) favouring OROS MPH.
Interventions to improve perinatal care practices showed a statistically significant difference in maternal mortality favouring treatment (OR = 0.62; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.98, p = 0.042).
