Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a statistical difference was observed between" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the results of a study or analysis that compares two or more groups or conditions.
Example: "In the experiment, a statistical difference was observed between the control group and the experimental group, indicating a significant effect of the treatment."
Alternatives: "a significant difference was noted between" or "a measurable difference was found between".
Exact(5)
On the contrar, for 6 hours of culture, a statistical difference was observed between 9.5×107, 1.90×108 and 3.8×108 CFUs/ml.
On the contrary for 6 hours of culture, a statistical difference was observed between 9.5×107, 1.9×108, 3.8×108 CFUs/ml.
Thus, in both patient-basis and strain-basis analyses, a statistical difference was observed between the 2006 2007 study and the 2012 2013 study (p < 0.01).
Although we measured weight in the current study and a statistical difference was observed between groups, the study design and short duration preclude the ability to make clinical inferences.
A statistical difference was observed between viral load means, log 5.85 IU/mL (95% CI 5.67 6.02) for patients with HCV in saliva vs. 4.77 IU/mL (95% CI 4.35 5.19) for patients without HCV in saliva (p = 0.0001).
Similar(55)
However, no formal statistical difference was observed between the two cohorts, and interpretation is limited by the unknown prevalence of left and right BBB morphologies in each.
No statistical difference was observed between the various fracture fragments and their association with LCL or MCL tears.
For preoperative baseline data, no statistical difference was observed between both groups (all P > 0.05, Table 1).
No statistical difference was observed between these two groups (P=0.41).
For any given spatial frequency, no statistical difference was observed between the optical conditions.
However, no statistical difference was observed between Groups I and II (Table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com