Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a statistical analyses" is not correct in written English.
The correct form should be "a statistical analysis" since "analysis" is singular.
Example: "The study included a statistical analysis of the data collected over the past year."
Alternatives: "a statistical evaluation" or "a statistical examination."
Exact(6)
Table 1 Means (standard deviation) for the bond strength (MPa) Groups Bond strength (MPa) Universal-moist 8.9 (1.5)A Universal-dry 7.1 (1.7)A Control 9.9 (2.8)A Statistical analyses showed no differences among groups.
a Statistical analyses were done by the Fisher's exact test.
Note also that spurs increase with age therefore, it will be important to perform a statistical analyses between groups.
(A ) Statistical analyses of the size of the contact area of primary naive B cells expressing B1-8-IgM-BCR from B1-8 Tg mice when encountering of the indicated types of NP-TGT sensors.
In our study, we did not include the -634G/C variant; however, although we performed a statistical analyses in which only the -2578C/A, -1154G/A SNPs were considered for this analysis, the lack of association between VEGF haplotypes frequencies and PE was consistent.
This study revealed numerically higher (a statistical analyses was not performed) proportions of clinical responders among individuals with more severe baseline illness than those with less severe baseline illness (CGI S of 4, 78.9 %; CGI S of 5, 83.5 %; CGI S of ≥6, 88.4 %) [ 23].
Similar(54)
For all statistical analyses, a p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
In all statistical analyses, a P-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
In all statistical analyses, a two-tailed P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
For all statistical analyses, a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
For all statistical analyses, a p value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com