The phrase "a statement that argued" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific assertion or claim made in a discussion or debate that presents a particular viewpoint or position.
Example: "In her essay, she included a statement that argued for the necessity of renewable energy sources in combating climate change."
Alternatives: "a claim that contended" or "an assertion that maintained".
Cities are the future – a statement that is difficult to argue with if predictions that 7 out of 10 people will be living in urban areas by 2050 comes true.
In conclusion, and in a statement that is hard to argue with, the announcement said, "Bo's behaviors have brought serious consequences, badly undermined the reputation of the Party and the country, created a very negative impact at home and abroad, and significantly damaged the cause of the Party and people".
It's a statement that's hard to argue with.
Transocean, which is conducting its own investigation of the disaster, disagreed, arguing in a statement that well design had played a critical role in the accident and accusing BP of having made "cost-saving decisions that increased risk — in some cases, severely".
Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) sharply criticized the measure in a Tuesday statement that argued shifting Social Security funds from retirement insurance to disability insurance has been routine in the past.
More than 70 major conservative leaders have signed a Right on Crime statement of principles that argues that criminal justice systems ought to be subject to the same cost-benefit scrutiny applied to other government programs.
In a statement, OneMain argued that its successes were not particularly sweeping, noting that it lost in a handful of states.
And a school can censor statements that do that, argues Kenneth Starr (of Monica Lewinsky fame), who is representing the school board pro bono.Listening to both sides' arguments, the nine justices seemed torn.
In a statement, he argued that "the United States should stand for self-determination for our strongest partners.
In a statement, McCrory argued that the bill was necessary in preventing "government overreach" from local municipalities.
