The phrase "a statement from the editor" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a message or announcement made by the editor of a publication, such as a newspaper, magazine, or online platform.
Example: "In the latest issue, there is a statement from the editor addressing the recent changes in editorial policy."
Alternatives: "an announcement by the editor" or "a message from the editor".
(A year and a half later, The Times, stung by criticism over its initial handling of the story, published a statement from the editors that Stober and Hoffman say "strived to apologize without admitting guilt").
This article has been updated to include further allegations against Trump and a statement from the editor-in-chief of People magazine.
A statement from the paper's executive editor, Martin Baron, accused Iran of "indefensible silence" in having kept Mr Rezaian in jail for nine months without revealing why.
Instead of the ghostwritten article, Fugh-Berman published a different article, "The Corporate Coauthor," which appeared in the same journal -- the Journal of General Internal Medicine (JGIM) -- in June 2005, alongside comments from the journal's co-editors and a statement from the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME).
Members of the student council asked the editors to take the essay down and, according to a statement from the council, "enter into negotiations about their status".
— A statement from the Russian Foreign Ministry.
A statement from the J.D.F.
Another brick in this wall of logic against the New York Times is a statement from James Bennet, the top editor at the New York Times' editorial operation, to CNN attempting to salvage the piece's respectability: "While it is always agonizing to get something wrong we appreciate it when our readers call us out like this.
Referring to headlines in The Free Beacon like "Bootylicious Beyoncé Solicits for Obama," ThinkProgress.org sent a statement from its editor, Judd Legum, that said: "They are not an imitation of ThinkProgress.
READERS have asked why The Times waited so long to address the issues raised in Wednesday's statement from the editors.
