Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a standards for" is not correct in English.
It should be "a standard for" or "standards for" depending on the context. You can use "a standard for" when referring to a single criterion or benchmark, and "standards for" when discussing multiple criteria or benchmarks.
Example: "This document outlines a standard for evaluating employee performance."
Alternatives: "a benchmark for" or "criteria for".
Exact(2)
After heat treatment at 80 °C for 120 min, TC reduced by 5.5 log10 while FC, FS and Salmonella were undetected and the biosolids met the US EPA, Class A standards for biosolids reuse.
A Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) diagram for patient enrollment is shown in Additional file 1: Supplemental Digital Content.
Similar(58)
"I've just had a great weekend in France, where I got the 'A' standard for the Olympic Games and the 'A' standard for the World Indoor Championships.
It's a standard for sure.
It sets a standard for future shows of its kind.
"Now we would never set a standard for anyone.
His integrity set a standard for us all.
Another, local gang definitely sets a standard for squalid thuggery.
"We need to set a standard for our two states".
"My office has set a standard for constituent services".
"That team has been a standard for this team".
More suggestions(5)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com