The phrase "a standard trust" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in legal or financial contexts to refer to a commonly accepted type of trust arrangement.
Example: "In estate planning, a standard trust can help manage assets for beneficiaries in a tax-efficient manner."
Alternatives: "a typical trust" or "a conventional trust".
We apply a standard trust game in the field with three treatments that allow us to relate our experimental results to actual soil conservation investments.
Trust seals are usually small graphics that say that a website is trusted/validated/verified/secure There are different types of trust seals - a standard trust seals, a security seal, a privacy seal, a business seal, but are all generally referred to as "trust seals" There are many trust seal providers available and prices vary from a couple of tens of dollars monthly to thousands of dollars.
Within English trusts law, a standard express trust has a relationship between the trustees and the beneficiaries; this does not apply to charitable trusts, partially because of the special definition of trustee used and partially because there are no individual beneficiaries identified in a charitable trust.
He established a quasi-blind trust rather than a standard blind trust, he said, so he would be able to avoid investing in companies he did not wish to be associated with.
In contrast, the "fairness question", a recently proposed alternative to the standard trust question, seems to operate through beliefs rather than preferences.
Partly in response to this poor security quality, several organizations have emerged with the aim of defining the so-called standard trust frameworks as a means to boot-strap trust among entities in the identity ecosystem[1, 2].
Our analysis suggests that the standard trust question used in the World Values Survey is a proxy for cooperation preferences rather than beliefs about others' cooperation.
Additionally, the audit of inductions indicated that F1s rotating into a new Trust for their second or third rotation generally only receive the standard Trust induction, which does not usually include those aspects that the F1s rated as useful in a departmental induction or the valued components of PfPP such as shadowing the new rotation's post.
We propose a risky trust game that experimentally measures risk in the same context as the standard trust game, but nevertheless reduces the trust decision to objective risk.
When a body is recognised, it becomes a 'press standards trust'.
Unlike standard trust region methods which calculate gradients with n or more sample points, where n is the number of variables, the proposed algorithm allows the number of sample points M to be less than n.
