Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "a standard test for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a commonly accepted method or procedure used to evaluate or measure something.
Example: "The SAT is a standard test for college admissions in the United States."
Alternatives: "a common assessment for" or "a typical evaluation for".
Exact(26)
The man went on to score normally on a standard test for musical memory.
In British politics there used to be a standard test for candidates for prime minister: Would you want to go on a tiger hunt with this person?
Their eyes burnt through the lens as experts from Doctors Without Borders were measuring their mid-upper arms, a standard test for possible signs of malnutrition.
The hardly less resourceful van Wijngaarden, on his own, perfected a paint medium, gelatin glue, to finesse a standard test for the age of oil paint: rubbing with alcohol, which dissolves oils that have had less than decades to dry.
While now a standard test for prostate cancer, PSA is not without its critics (see article).The latest thinking in the search for early detection of cancer is to combine several biomarkers.
The scheme is applied to shock tube problem and to a standard test for two-fluid codes.
Similar(34)
In 2008, American Iron and Steel Institute introduced a standard test method for conducting web crippling studies [4].
Swarztrauber, A standard test set for numerical approximations to the shallow-water equations on the sphere, J. Comput.
The following experiments use the Oxford image database [41], which is used as a standard test set for image matching tasks [35, 36, 40].
A standard test procedure for seats with horizontal suspensions could be developed from a test protocol used in a recent inter-laboratory study.
The ethylbenzene disproportionation on this zeolite was suggested as a standard test reaction for acidic zeolites by the Catalysis Commission of the International Zeolite Association IZAA).
More suggestions(15)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com