The phrase "a stakeholder engagement process" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing methods or strategies for involving stakeholders in a project or decision-making process.
Example: "The company implemented a stakeholder engagement process to ensure that all voices were heard during the planning phase."
Alternatives: "a stakeholder involvement strategy" or "a stakeholder consultation procedure."
The study team developed and implemented a stakeholder engagement process that provided iterative feedback regarding the study design, patient-centered outcomes, and intervention.
This study highlights the benefits and trade-offs that come with conducting participatory research as part of a stakeholder engagement process: while results are more likely to be decision-relevant within the local context, navigating stakeholder expectations and data limitations present ongoing challenges.
The instrument was adapted to the Nigerian context and refined through a stakeholder engagement process.
The ethical framework was developed with expertise from clinical, organisational and public health ethics and validated through a stakeholder engagement process.
The MRT utilized an intensive stakeholder engagement process to develop a plan to reduce costs in New York's Medicaid program while also focusing on improving quality and implementing reforms.
The Medicaid Redesign Team (MRT) is a nationally recognized innovative effort that utilized an intensive stakeholder engagement process to reduce costs in New York's Medicaid program while focusing on improving quality and implementing reforms.
Funded by the Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute, WISDOM is the product of a multi-year stakeholder engagement process that has brought together consumers, advocates, primary care physicians, specialists, policy makers, technology companies and payers to help break the deadlock in this debate and advance towards a new, dynamic approach to breast cancer screening.
To this purpose, the authors propose an integrated extension of the decision-making model described in [24], which consists of three parallel and intertwined processes, combining a (i) cognitive rational approach to organising the decision-making process, (ii) a five-level stakeholder engagement process, and (iii) quantitative analyses and methods.
Methods: We estimated the disease burden imposed by each risk factor using an attributable fraction approach, and we prioritized the risks using an empirically tested stakeholder engagement process.
This was done via the stakeholder engagement process, a thematic analysis of publicly available documents produced by funder evaluation departments, such as policies and good practice reports, and an analysis of evaluation frameworks, guides and tools identified from a systematic search of peer reviewed literature [ 21].
