Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a square of correlation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in statistical contexts to refer to the square of the correlation coefficient, which indicates the proportion of variance explained by a model.
Example: "In our analysis, we found that the square of correlation was 0.81, suggesting a strong relationship between the variables."
Alternatives: "coefficient of determination" or "R-squared value".
Exact(2)
These two models precisely and reliably calculated the IL toxicities with a square of correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.919 and a standard error of estimate (SE) of 0.341 (in log unit of mM) for pMIC, and an R2 of 0.913 and SE of 0.282 for pMBC.
The calibration curve generated using plasma as matrix showed a square of correlation coefficient of 0.9992.
Similar(58)
Because LD can affect both PCoA and STRUCTURE analyses, we thinned the marker set by excluding microsatellites in strong LD, i.e., markers with a square of the correlation coefficient (r) greater than 0.4 [ 65].
The square of correlation coefficients, R2, determined by a log-log multiple linear regression, lie between 0.98 and 0.99.
Moreover, the square of correlation coefficient was 0.985, which indicated a high reliability between the fitted curve and experimental data.
The square of the correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.975), the cross-validated correlation coefficient (QCV2= 0.859), and the square of correlation coefficients of the test set (QEXT2= 0.960) demonstrated the reliability of the model.
The calibration curve was linear within the range of 15 3000 ng mL−1 with the square of correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.998.
The values of square of correlation coefficient (R2) were 0.9946, 0.9908 and 0.9903 for untreated, methanol and HCl pretreated J. adhaerens biomass, respectively.
The results show that proposed model yielded accurate gas oil MMP with lowest average absolute deviation (AAD) and highest square of correlation coefficient (R2).
All the variables' square of correlation coefficients was smaller than the corresponding AVE, which provide modest support for the discriminant validity of the variables.
The root mean square errors (RMSE) of the training set, and the test set for GA MLR model were calculated to be 0.314 and 0.486, the square of correlation coefficients (R2) were obtained 0.801 and 0.803, respectively.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com