Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
And there's an even more fundamental problem: the book is based on a specious premise.
This specious assumption was proven wrong by a comparison between an mRNA sequence of adenovirus and the DNA from which it was transcribed, leading to the discovery of split genes and RNA splicing.
With such specious assumptions, the value of the findings is questionable.
It is a specious salmagundi of complacent assumptions and frightening arrogance.
Aristotle clearly believes that some of Zeno's assumptions have only a specious plausibility (see Top. 8.8.160b7 9, SE 24.279b17 21, Ph. 1.2.233a21 31, Metaph. B.4. 1001b13 16), so that they would by Aristotle's own criteria be examples of eristic rather than properly dialectical arguments.
This is a specious argument.
That is a specious argument.
That is, in part, a specious argument.
This isn't a specious argument.
What if its plans were blocked by a specious patent?
But in this twilight world "normal" is a specious concept.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com