The phrase "a small hazard" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a minor risk or danger in a particular situation or context.
Example: "While hiking, I encountered a small hazard in the form of loose rocks on the trail."
Alternatives: "a minor risk" or "a slight danger."
However, the antenna is a small hazard because of its aluminum rod elements.
A landslide hazard analysis based on this finding suggested that whilst future mudflows constitute a small hazard, the risk of harm arising from them is even smaller.
Upon entering the jet-way, I was prepared to dive through the narrow, round opening, but the stairway leading from the crew deck to the flight deck created a small hazard.
However, such a small hazard ratio may not be clinically significant.
Results, reported in Fig. 15, show that the settling velocity distribution VSET-2008 produces a smaller hazard area; this is caused by the greater fraction of fine particles (particles with settling velocity smaller that 5 m/s) with respect to the other particle settling velocity distributions considered.
The findings suggest a smaller hazard associated with the presence of each ACE D allele (i.e., moving from 0 (ACE II genotype) to 1 (ACE ID genotype) to 2 (ACE DD genotype)).
A hazard ratio of discharge <1 indicates a smaller hazard of being discharged and therefore an excess of stay adjusted for the length of stay before the index day (time-adjusted model) and additional confounders (fully-adjusted model) [ 28].
Furthermore, a very small hazard probability in the present period leads to large relative changes in the hazard component, which likely dominate changes in IRI.
The city manager and the council deserve a lot of praise and credit". Three small hazard mitigation projects have been approved by FEMA: raising the flood barriers at the Laguna Beach Animal Shelter; installation of a 30-inch concrete pipe at the Bark Park; and additional concrete deadweight to stabilize the Main Beach boardwalk.
Evidence of medical harm from the stray wisp of smoke in a workplace or restaurant remains vanishingly thin.However, let us grant that second-hand smoke is probably a small health hazard; in any case, it is certainly a smelly nuisance.
Using standard parameters to test at the 5% significance level and with a 90% power, the minimum population size required to confidently detect small hazard ratios would be 516, thus it was safe to assume that the sample size was large enough to produce statistical significance.
