Sentence examples for a slight variability from inspiring English sources
The phrase "a slight variability" is correct and usable in written English
It can be used when discussing minor differences or changes in a particular context, such as data analysis or scientific observations. Example: "The experiment showed a slight variability in the results, indicating that further testing may be necessary."
A further limitation is a certain uncertainty for measurements that might lead to a slight variability in measured sizes of signal voids and that we only compared vendor-specific sequences and could not investigate SEMAC or compare MAVRIC with SEMAC.
A few elements (Li, B, and Sr) are characterised by a slight variability (i.e. coefficient of variation ≤0.4; Fig. 4), whereas four other elements (As, V, Cr, and Fe) are characterised by a marked variability (i.e. coefficient of variation ≥0.4; Fig. 4).
This means that, despite the accuracy with which the videos were collected in this study, still some participants performed a slight variability in their gait pattern.
Nevertheless, miR-487b, miR-212 and miR-770-5p miR-770-5p miR-770-5priability among the different lympresentedes, especially slightnd MZL/MALT.
The sequences of all the overlapping RACE products were strictly identical (apart from a slight variability observed at the level of the 5'- and 3'-UTRs), and a full-length 2837-bp cDNA, called TomLoxF, was identified (GenBank: FJ617476).
The small proportion of abnormal embryos observed from both groups might have arisen as a result of incomplete Oct4 deletion or slight variability of the developmental stage at the time of treatment.
Each of these Borrelia types showed slight variability in their IGS fragment sequence (Table 3); however, they formed a distinct cluster away from other borrelial species.
Speaking of the sun's slight variability, he said, "Acting as though this is the alternative" to blaming greenhouse gases "is asking for trouble".
The impact patterns alternated between the highly regulated class with extremely decreasing flow magnitude, slight variability, and extreme intermittency and the slightly regulated class with extremely increasing flow magnitude, slight variability, and extreme intermittency from 1973 to 1987 and then stabilized in the latter class from 1988 to 2001.
After 2001, the pattern gradually changed from the moderately regulated class with moderately decreasing flow magnitude, extreme variability, and extreme intermittency to the slightly regulated class with slightly decreasing flow magnitude, slight variability, and no intermittency.
Further assessment of cell viability, in particular apoptosis via immunohistochemistry of cleaved caspase-3 (CC3), revealed slight variability within the microtissues, but all positive staining was of low levels with only individual cells or small cell clusters showing morphological features consistent with apoptosis or CC3 immunopositivity (Fig. 1B).
