The phrase "a single relation in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a specific connection or association within a particular context, such as in mathematics, databases, or social sciences.
Example: "In this study, we will focus on a single relation in the dataset that highlights the correlation between education and income."
Alternatives: "one relationship in" or "a unique connection in".
We then focus on aggregate views and queries over a single relation, which are fundamental in many applications such as data warehousing.
For this contribution, we defined the mapping such that each non-abstract IFC class is represented in a single relation that combines all attributes from all super-classes.
The in silico simulations predicted that similar temperature dependencies of the k cat of all glycolytic enzymes should result in a single relation between metabolite level and residual substrate concentration for each metabolite, independent of temperature.
Is grounding unitary in the sense that there is a single dependence relation in play in claims like those discussed above?
That is, a single semantic relation is represented in the same way in the semantic representation level, across various different textual expressions, and hence retrieved with a single query.
It does this by making the existing limits on banks' loans to a single borrower, in relation to capital, apply to credit exposures resulting from derivatives transactions, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements and securities lending and borrowing transactions.
Further, in a clutch size of one, there is no need to allocate food between siblings of a single brood in relation to offspring sex or quality (Kölliker et al. 1998; Draganoiu et al. 2006).
Secondly, it enables comparison of trials that use a similar approach with one another, rather than putting all acupuncture trials together as if they were all the same (that is, comparing like with like), both in discussions of the implications of a single trial in relation to others and within a systematic review.
The scalability of a single item in relation to the other items in the scale or an item set is expressed by the value H i. According to Watson et al. [ 36], the following interpretation of H scores is applied: 0.30 – 0.39 = weak scale, 0.40 – 0.50 = medium scale, and > 0.50 strong scale.
Although moderation and mediation are distinct processes, a variable may function both as a moderator and a mediator in a single functional relation [ 60].
