Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
a single for each
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "a single for each" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be intended to convey the idea of having one item or instance corresponding to each of a set of items, but it needs additional context or rephrasing to be clear. Example: "We need to ensure that there is a single item for each participant in the event."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
1 human-written examples
You can add a single for each of the batsmen to that lot to complete the overs' runs.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
59 human-written examples
An all payer rate setting system would allow associations of insurers to negotiate with each provider for a single price for each service it offers.
News & Media
This resulted in a single score for each student for SC1 and a single score for each student for SC2.> Data were assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test.
Science
Values for each hemisphere were averaged in order to arrive at a single value for each region and each rat.
Science
The input reads would each receive a single count for each score type at each position.
Science
The pitch is calculated (similar to that shown for a single speech) for each syllable of the three output streams.
Phenotypes and selection were for a single trait for each breeding program.
A single value for each predictor was determined for each county, and collated into a single database.
Science
Cameron has usefully called for publication of a single figure for each executive's earnings over the year.
News & Media
Moreover, we opted to continue using a single array for each memory load for much of the same reasons.
Academia
Findings indicate that clinicians usually report multiple reasons for discontinuation, rather than a single reason for each patient.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming for clarity, replace "a single for each" with simpler, grammatically sound alternatives like "one for each" or "a single item for every".
Common error
Avoid using "a single for each" in an attempt to sound sophisticated; it often introduces confusion. Instead, opt for straightforward language that clearly conveys the allocation of one item per entity.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "a single for each" attempts to express the allocation of one item to each member of a group. However, Ludwig AI notes that it is grammatically incorrect. Its intended function is to denote individual assignment.
Frequent in
Science
35%
News & Media
35%
Formal & Business
30%
Less common in
Academia
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "a single for each" is intended to convey the idea of allocating one item per unit, but it is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. Ludwig AI highlights this issue. To express this concept correctly, use alternatives like "one for each" or "a single item for every". Although the phrase appears across various contexts such as science, news, and business, it should be avoided in formal writing due to its grammatical flaws. Always aim for clear and grammatically sound language to avoid confusion.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
one for each
This is the most direct and grammatically correct substitute, maintaining the original meaning.
a single item for every
This version replaces 'each' with 'every' and clarifies 'for' with 'item', emphasizing individual allocation.
one per
This is a concise version, suitable for technical contexts where brevity is valued.
a unique for every
Replaces single with unique, which stresses that the element is one of a kind or special.
individual to each
Emphasizes a tailored or customized assignment to each recipient.
dedicated to each
Suggests that the resource is specifically set aside for each individual.
specifically for each
Focuses on the specificity of the allocation, highlighting that it's not a general provision.
allocated to each
A formal way of stating resources have been assigned for everyone.
apportioned to each
Implies a more calculated or distributed allocation to each member.
assigned individually to each
Highlights the individualized process of assignment, ensuring personal attention.
FAQs
What is the clearest alternative to "a single for each"?
The clearest alternatives include "one for each" or "a single item for every", which are grammatically correct and easy to understand.
How can I use the concept of "a single for each" in a sentence correctly?
Rephrase to use alternatives like "one item per person" or "each person receives a single item" to ensure grammatical accuracy and clarity.
Is "a single for each" grammatically correct?
No, the phrase "a single for each" is not grammatically correct. You should use alternatives such as "one for each" or "a single item for every".
What's the difference between "a single for each" and "one for each"?
While both aim to convey individual allocation, "one for each" is grammatically correct and universally understood, whereas "a single for each" is considered incorrect.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
2.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested