The phrase "a single decision to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to one specific choice or action that has significant implications or consequences.
Example: "A single decision to invest in renewable energy can lead to substantial long-term benefits for the environment."
Alternatives: "one choice to" or "a solitary decision to".
I found no asymmetry when I examined the response of a single decision maker to its own costs.
Given that prior studies comparing the performance of a single decision tree to ensemble-based decision trees have favoured the predictive ability of the latter, we believe that the ensemble-based trees will provide a more accurate predictive ability.
Diagnostic tests commonly are characterized by their true positive (sensitivity) and true negative (specificity) classification rates, which rely on a single decision threshold to classify a test result as positive.
While this is potentially useful in an inference making context where robustness or lack of it may be explored over a range of possible selection models, it is less useful in a decision making context where a single decision has to be made.
Right now, I want to focus on a single decision that continues to look like the key turning point in the crisis: the decision to let Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. fail.
2. Since involvement and satisfaction can vary for different decisions even within the same meeting, the rating is made in relation to a single decision 3. Parochial references to a particular professional group, or a style or setting of working, are to be avoided to minimise country-specific items which reduce cross-cultural validity.
Responsibility can not be given to a single decision maker, everyone needs to play their part.
The preferences of different individuals, for example, may be taken to reflect differing evaluative judgments about alternatives so that combining these different preferences into a single decision becomes analogous to resolving value conflicts in the individual case.
The random forest classifier was chosen due to its superior performance over a single decision tree with respect to accuracy.
That history could be wiped out by a single decision by this court to open up the doors to coordination with outside groups and effectively render campaign contribution limits meaningless.
