The phrase "a significantly lower error" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the accuracy or performance of different methods, models, or systems, indicating that one has a notably reduced error rate.
Example: "After implementing the new algorithm, we observed a significantly lower error in our predictions compared to the previous model."
Alternatives: "a markedly reduced error" or "a considerably smaller error".
In this paper, we show that by searching among degree distributions designed for UEP with worse threshold than the corresponding non-UEP degree distributions, we may find degree distributions with significantly lower error rates for a finite length than the degree distributions with the best possible threshold.
We test our method on three publicly available gene expression datasets and achieve significantly lower error rate for a substantial identifiable subset of patients.
Newcomer et al. (2000) [ 28] reported significantly larger repositioning error in patients with LBP in trunk flexion and significantly lower error in trunk extension when compared to a control group.
Blegen et al. [ 15] analyzed factors that increase adverse events in hospitalized patients and found that, compared to patients treated in hospitals with few experienced nurses, patients treated in hospitals with numerous experienced nurses have significantly lower error rates, readmission rates, infection rates, and mortality rates and experience significantly fewer falls and pressure sores.
At the timepoint at which the Fv/Fm of the un-watered plants was first significantly lower (error bars showing standard error are no longer overlapping) than that of the watered plants, they were subject to either heat shock by incubation in the dark (to ensure equal levels of light) at 50°C for 3 h (heat and combined treatment) or 28°C for 3 h (control and drought treatment).
In one case, the paper and pencil mode of data collection produced a 6.7% error frequency, compared with a significantly lower 2.8% error frequency obtained by patients using the microcomputer technology [ 35].
A novel fifth-order scheme SDIRK[5,1](5)L_02 is derived with a significantly lower relative error norm than the comparable fifth-order A-stable reference method.
A Tukey post-hoc test for hip abduction revealed that digital photographic (4.8° ±3.8) measurement had a significantly lower measurement error than visual estimation (6.2° ±4.1, p = 0.015).
