The phrase "a significantly higher response" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing the level of responses or reactions in different scenarios, studies, or surveys.
Example: "In the survey, we observed a significantly higher response from participants who were incentivized compared to those who were not."
Alternatives: "a notably greater response" or "a considerably increased response."
Its encapsulated version provides a significantly higher response (60.0 s), both times are obtained with the same method.
In CV studies, in the presence of ethanol G/NiPPy modified electrode shows a significantly higher response for ethanol oxidation.
In CV studies, in the presence of methanol NiMn alloy modified electrode shows a significantly higher response for methanol oxidation.
The efficacy of this treatment has recently been demonstrated in a randomized phase III trial in patients with metastatic midgut NET, which showed that the addition of 177Lu-DOTA-TATE treatment to best supportive care resulted in a significantly higher response rate (18% vs. 3%, p < 0.001) and longer progression-free survival (65.2% vs. 10.8% at 20 months, p < 0.001) (Strosberg et al., 2017).
Compared with SoC alone, nVNS + SoC was also associated with a significantly higher response rate (i.e. the proportion of participants with a ≥50 % reduction from baseline in the number of CH attacks per week; 40 % for nVNS + SoC vs 8.3 % for SoC alone, P < 0.001) and significantly greater improvements from baseline in quality-of-life measures, with no serious treatment-related adverse events.
Patients with low RRM2 mRNA expression attained a significantly higher response rate and time to progression than those with high RRM2 expression.
In our study of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with gemcitabine plus docetaxel, patients with low levels of both RRM1 and RRM2 had a significantly higher response rate (60% vs 14.2%), time to progression (9.9 vs 2.3 months), and overall survival (15.4 vs 3.6 months) than patients with high levels of both genes[17].
A randomised crossover study of ACASI and computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) in 445 adult volunteers from China, India, Peru, Russia, and Zimbabwe, found few differences in responses between methods, except for China, where volunteers gave a significantly higher response to some sensitive questions (i.e. ever had sex, number of partners, and unprotected acts) in CAPI [11].
In conclusion, revaccination with BCG resulted in modest boosting of pre-existing immune responses to PPD and antigen 85, but vaccination with BCG-MVA85A induced a significantly higher response to antigen 85 and generated a higher frequency of antigen 85A-specific CD8+ T cells.
Patients optimized with PEA (n = 66) showed a significantly higher response rate [ 87].
The Boost had a significantly higher response rate in outer London PCTs than the Core.
