Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a significantly higher quantities" is not correct in English.
It should be "a significantly higher quantity" or "significantly higher quantities." You can use it when comparing amounts or levels of something, ensuring that the noun agrees in number with the modifier.
Example: "The study found that there were significantly higher quantities of pollutants in the water samples taken from the industrial area."
Alternatives: "a considerably larger amount" or "much greater quantities."
Exact(1)
Compared to CG2, the PG had a significantly higher quantities of used cigarettes and narghile; had a significantly higher percentage of cigarette and narghile users; had a significantly higher physical activity score; had a significantly lower BMI and had a significantly lower percentage of sedentary or obese subjects or subjects having low-SE.
Similar(59)
In the historical group, resuscitation efforts lasted longer and a significantly higher quantity of additional epinephrine was needed.
The neovascularization was quantified by counting and averaging 5 separate sections, revealing a significantly higher quantity of neovascular cell nuclei in the oxygen-treated wild-type mice compared to oxygen-treated IL-10−/− mice (Figure 1M).
In the epinephrine group, resuscitation efforts lasted longer and a significantly higher quantity of additional epinephrine was needed.
The FL contained a significantly higher quantity of T-lymphoid progenitors and/or NK-cell progenitors in compartment of HPCs in comparison with the FTPT and the CB).
We have demonstrated that the FTPT, similarly to the FL, contains a significantly higher quantity of erythroid progenitors with the CD34+CD45lowCD235+SSClow phenotype in compartment of HPCs compared to the CB).
They also reported consuming a significantly higher quantity of alcohol than the residential group (Z = −4.6, p < 0.001), had significantly more social support (Z = −5.3, p < 0.001), had shorter sleep durations (Z = −3.2, p = 0.001), and spent less time sitting (Z = −5.6, p < 0.001).
Both the aggregated and non-aggregated cells grown under 0 200 mM salt concentrations produced IAA even at 200 mM salt concentration with a peak at 100 mM concentration with aggregated cells producing significantly higher quantities.
Compared to CG1, the PG had significantly higher quantities of used cigarettes and narghile; had a significantly higher percentage of cigarette and narghile users; had a significantly higher physical activity score, weight and BMI; had a significantly lower percentage of sedentary subjects or subjects with low SL, and was significantly younger.
NBF infants consumed significantly higher quantities of commercial baby foods than ABF infants, with a consequent higher intake of macronutrients from these foods (p < 0.001).
In this study, 152Tb was produced at significantly higher quantities (30 times more) than previously achieved.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com