The phrase "a significantly higher data" is not correct in standard English usage.
The term "data" is typically treated as a plural noun, so it would be more appropriate to use "significantly higher amount of data" or "significantly higher data set."
Example: "The new software can process a significantly higher amount of data than the previous version."
Alternatives: "a considerably larger dataset" or "a notably increased volume of data."
Multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems have an advantage of spectral efficiency compared to single-input single-output systems, which means that the MIMO systems have significantly higher data throughput.
However, the errors for the other single-SDS cases were significantly higher (data not shown for the unknown d case).
Besides these comparisons among immigrants, risk factors such as diabetes, primiparity, previous stillbirth, age <20 years, less education, unemployed father were significantly less prevalent in non-immigrant compared with immigrant mothers, but rates of preterm birth and low birthweight were significantly higher (data not shown).
If blastoid variants of MCL were compared to normal MCL, no difference in telomerase activity was found (data not shown) although blastoid MCL did present with a significantly higher proliferation index (data not shown).
For the presence absence dataset, the PERMDISP analyses also showed a significantly higher dispersion of the data in the North and South than in the Center.
According to these comparisons, the partitioned MrBayes analysis of the concatenated data has a significantly higher marginal likelihood than the unpartitioned analysis of the same data.
Prednisolone users, however, had a significantly higher disease activity than nonusers (data not shown) and the significant association between prednisolone and the change in DXR-MCI disappeared in the multivariate analysis (Table 3).
DMRs identified in the CETS modeled SMRI data exhibited a significantly higher proportion of DNA methylation changes in the same direction as the NICHD neuronal data set as compared with the non-transformed CHARM data (CETS modeled overlap = 92%, non-modeled overlap = 36%, Fisher's OR = 17.3, p = 0.0053).
The array data showed a significantly higher accumulation of H4K16ac along Jarid1c gene body compared to Jarid1d, the latter showing signals no higher than background (data not shown).
Scandinavian countries and Switzerland receive far fewer applicants but accept a significantly higher rate of Afghans, according to data from the European Commission.
