It was shown that by attaching an optimized TMD to a bridge, a significantly faster response reduction can be achieved.
In the first 8 weeks of treatment (acute phase), the respiratory subtype group had a significantly faster response to clonazepam.
This analysis revealed a significantly faster response during the attribution of high personal relevance in high novelty seekers compared to low novelty seekers (t(10) = 2.836, p = 0.009, independent samples t-test, 1-sided).
Using images that were parametrically morphed along a continuum between trained ("familiar") and untrained ("unfamiliar") faces, Rossion demonstrated significantly faster response times (RTs) for sex classification of the familiar stimuli compared to the unfamiliar images [8].
For 90 km/hr condition, the transition phase showed significantly faster response time in preoperative than 2 weeks postoperative.
In contrast to that, the sensors based on pHEMA are found to have significantly faster response which is comparable to the D4-based sensors.
In addition, for 50 km/hr condition, the transition phase showed significantly faster response time in 4 weeks than 2 weeks postoperative.
In the context of the no-shadow condition, the chimpanzees showed significantly longer response times under the occluded trials than under the control and gap conditions (p < 0.001), whereas they showed significantly faster response times under the control trials than under the gap (p < 0.001) and occluded (p = 0.002) trials in the context of the shadow condition.
Post-hoc comparisons confirmed that the chimpanzees showed significantly longer response times under the occluded trials than under the control and gap trials (p < 0.001) in the context of the no-shadow condition, whereas they showed significantly faster response times under the control than under the gap and occluded trials in the context of the shadow condition (p < 0.001).
Using a within-group paired t test comparison, BD had significantly faster responses to sure choices after FB presentation (msec, mean ± SD, HL baseline: 467.99 ± 30.18; after FB: 421.00 ± 22.80, t17 = 2.88, p =.01) with no difference in RT in risky choices (msec, mean ± SD, HL baseline: 429.20 ± 30.18; after FB: 408.91 ± 20.32, t15 = 1.38, p =.186).
Post-hoc analysis revealed significantly faster responses to PC versus ToM across all groups, t(47) = 2.40, p = .02, Cohen's d = .75.75
