Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
All groups showed a significant trial effect demonstrating that some groups learned while others did not (F5,175 = 280.22, p<0.0001).
A significant trial effect for the escape latency [F 3,90) = 11.19, p<0.0001] and path length [F 3,90) = 7.36, p = 0.0002] was associated with a decrease of these parameters across the four trials.
These differences were further supported by a significant trial effect (F5,125 = 285.31, p<0.01), yet no interaction was noted between the factors of group and trials (F20,125 = 9.24, p = 0.41).
There was a significant TRIAL effect (P = 0.004, rdf = 0.81).
Moreover, unlike both the prespawn (LRb; χ = 0.40, P = 1) and postspawn (LRb; χ = 6.79, P = 0.731) periods of direct competition, there was a significant trial effect on nest fidelity (LRb; χ = 20.56, P < 0.001) in the absence of competition, indicative of the high variation in behaviour observed.
Similar(7)
A 5 (dose) × 3 (trial blocks) mixed factorial ANOVA for escape time yielded a significant trial blocks effect only (p <.001), showing performance improving over sessions.
We tested whether there was a significant Trial × Cultivar interaction effect for both locations (Kyela and Mbita).
Additionally, a significant trial by anger expression style interaction effect was found [F 1,54) = 54.47, p = .000].000]
Conversely, there was a significant trial by anger expression style interaction effect [F 1,54) = 5.89, p = .02].
Three-way (two arm configurations × three object conditions × five trial types) ANOVAs revealed a significant effect of trial type on peak right-hand force (F4,20 = 4.44; p = 0.02).
Here responding to the transfer CS was higher on same than on different trials: ANOVA with block and trial type (same or different) as factors revealed a significant effect of trial type, F 1,15) = 6.47, p = .023; the effect of block was also significant, F 1,15) = 17.12, p = .0009, but the interaction was not, F < 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com