The phrase "a significant small" is not correct in written English.
It is a contradictory expression, as "significant" implies something large or important, while "small" indicates the opposite.
Example: "The study revealed a significant small error in the calculations."
Alternatives: "a notable minor" or "a considerable little".
There was a significant small positive treatment effect for school-based PA interventions for adolescent girls (k = 17, g = 0.37, p < 0.05).
A significant small crack effect is observed in this alloy, consistent with previous observations, where small cracks grew at stress intensity factor ranges below the long crack threshold and at higher rates than long cracks for equivalent ΔK levels.
A significant small crack effect is evident in this alloy, and it is observed that the influence of loading variables on small crack behavior is profoundly different from that on long cracks.
We find that the immigrant-native ratio has a significant small impact on the average occupational wage rates of that region.
Minimal differences were found for the POMS measures, with only POMS tiredness demonstrating a significant small to medium effect (see Table 5, group differences in secondary outcome measures from pre- to post-test comparing those assigned to the control condition versus the intervention condition).
According to Egger's test, there is a significant "small study effect", smaller studies reported more pronounced superiority of DES compared to larger studies (bias estimate Egger's test: −1.71, standard error 0.77, slope 0.24, p = 0.034, Figure S3).
2008 is the year when digital sports broadcasting will come of age, and although the NBA's planned service is the last of the trio to arrive at the party, the league's current lack of a significant small-screen presence means that delivering live action, via a laptop screen, will court favour among its impoverished fan base.
Furthermore, both methods require a significant smaller number of function evaluations when compared to Monte Carlo simulations with kink-jump moves.
Pregnant women showed a significant smaller precuing benefit at week 36 of pregnancy than did the control women, indicating loss of selective attention.
The decrease in renal microvascular thrombosis in SL group could be at least partly explained by the delayed and attenuated procoagulant response (sodium lactate infusion resulted in a significant smaller decrease in platelets and fibrinogen concentrations and a significant smaller increase in plasma levels of TAT).
The synesthete showed a significant smaller set size effect and responded significantly faster.
