However, a significant interaction was observed.
A significant interaction was also found between length and stimulation.
Duncan's multiple-range test was used for multiple comparisons when a significant interaction was detected.
When a significant interaction was found, a post hoc testing was performed to determine pairwise differences.
Besides, a significant interaction was found between feed to inoculum ratio and organic loading.
A significant interaction was found for Group × Condition, F (1,22) = 4.16, p ≤ .05.05
A significant interaction was found between isoform and area, although, the two case groups did not partition on this measure.
Results: For GSTM1 genotype, a significant interaction was seen between gender and age among never smokers (p = 0.003).
A significant interaction was observed in CR removal with the combination effects of pH, adsorbent dose, initial dye concentration, time, and temperature.
A significant interaction was identified on relationships with colleagues over time only (P < .045, η 2 p = .085) (see Table 3).
Furthermore, a significant interaction was present in knee extension strength between HH and LL subjects (p = 0.031).
