Sentence examples for a significant interaction of training from inspiring English sources

In the novel + hint sentence production task, this discrepancy yielded a significant interaction of training method and Rhyme&Melody training mode.

At both testing times, there was a significant interaction of training method and Rhyme&Melody, reflecting that, compared to Prose, the effect of Rhyme&Melody was particularly strong in the blocked as compared to the random training method.

A follow-up two-way rANOVA showed a significant interaction of training and site (left PPC, right PPC, Cz) (F2,22 = 9.76, p = 0.001), consistent with decreased performance before, but not after, training for left PPC.

For ventral rTMS, a significant interaction of training and site (left LO, right LO, Cz) (F2,22 = 6.29, p = 0.007) was also observed, but the pattern was reversed: performance under ventral stimulation decreased after, but not before, training.

Contrary to this hypothesis, subjects showed on average only a 2% increase (range 0 6%) in CFFT across the nine-days of testing (see Figure 4a) and no subjects showed significant correlations between days-of-training and CFFT, or a significant interaction of group and training-day when compared with the Flicker-Only Group (p = 0.99; ANOVA).

A significant interaction of time and training mode was detected for the countermovement jump in favor of the INST group.

This asymmetry was supported by an rANOVA with a significant interaction of session (pre versus post) and training task (feature-difference versus signal-in-noise) for the feature task (F1,31 = 6.60, p = 0.015), but not the signal-in-noise task (F1,31 = 2.52, p = 0.122).

The 3-way ANOVA did not demonstrate a significant main effect of Risk factor; however, it did indicate a significant interaction of Risk with Treatment factors.

However, there was a significant interaction effect (exercise training × intensity) for the changes in VO2peak after 2 months of exercise training.

The right panel of Fig. 5 shows the mean RT across subjects in the gradual condition of experiments 1 and 2. A two-way mixed design ANOVA reveals that there was a significant interaction between the training phase and the availability of the cursor feedback (F 1,21)  = 28.61, p<0.0001).

A two-way mixed design ANOVA revealed a significant interaction effect between the training phase and training condition (F 1,16)  = 5.69, p<0.001).