The phrase "a significant interaction for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in research or statistical contexts to indicate that there is a meaningful relationship or effect between variables being studied.
Example: "The analysis revealed a significant interaction for age and treatment type, suggesting that the effectiveness of the treatment varied across different age groups."
Alternatives: "a notable interaction regarding" or "an important interaction concerning".
There was also a significant interaction for protein levels between the BDNF genotype and high-risk status after adjustments (p = 0.040).
Analysis of variance of the factorial design revealed that high glucose and LPS had a significant interaction for cell apoptosis, but not for cell proliferation.
These results demonstrated that dietary LP and VC had a significant interaction for red sea bream with the capability of improving growth performance and enhancing stress resistance by immunomodulation.
The analysis revealed a significant interaction for RT, F 1,21) = 16.01, p<.001.
In addition, there was a trend towards a significant interaction for the right anterior insula (F 1,16) = 3.45, P = 0.082).
In addition, a significant interaction between Attention and Landmark was found (F 1,39) = 8.4, p<0.006), as well as a significant interaction for Attention × Landmark × Group (F 1,39) = 4.7, p<0.04).
There was a significant interaction term for the pain intensity and for the length of migraine episodes.
The lack of a significant interaction response for western hemlock (even though the parameter for this term is statistically significant) can be attributed to the small estimated value for parameter b04 in Equation 4.
The difference was highlighted using multivariate linear regression modelling for (ln CMVgB antibody, which yielded a significant interaction term for the covariate (ln HIVgp41 (P = 0.007; Supplementary Table 1).
The full model MANOVA showed a significant main effect for condition, p < 0.05, and a significant interaction effect for hearing status and condition, p < 0.05.
All three factors had a strong individual effect (p < 0.001), with a significant interaction effect for temp.
