The phrase "a significant difference where" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a notable distinction or variation in a specific context or situation.
Example: "The study revealed a significant difference where the treatment group showed improved results compared to the control group."
Alternatives: "a notable difference in" or "a meaningful difference in".
As for the religious or philosophical position of the interviewed students, it is possible to observe a significant difference, where the highest average was obtained by atheists/agnostics, followed by adherents of spiritism.
For the local comparisons between the vertical phoria and the viewing distance, there was no difference before and after prism correction at 40 cm, but the Scheffé post hoc test showed a significant difference where the surface of CoP excursions and SDx were significantly smaller at 200 cm after the prism correction (p = 0.005 and p = 0.007, respectively).
With sufficient sample sizes, standard statistical comparisons (e.g., student's t test, Wilcoxon rank sum) may detect a statistically significant difference where the clinical significance is questionable [21].
That is the second highest in the OECD, in which the average rate is 31% (see chart).In a world of multinational firms and mobile capital, tax rates can make a significant difference to where profits are recorded and business is done, though economists disagree on how much.
There was a significant difference in where people bought particular food products.
When comparing the Konan Robo SP8000 to a non-contact instrument by Zeiss regarding mean cell area, significant differences where detected so that the authors recommend not to use the instruments interchangeably [ 13].
It is a limited partnership sustained by the perception of mutual if asymmetrical gains, and the wisdom to underplay significant differences where they occur.
Instead, by entering the race as competitors, campaigners for each brother were forced to create significant differences where there were actually very few, and damaged the advantage of their natural alliance as the party begins its stint in opposition.
Significant distraction was determined by performing t-tests between the GB+ condition and the GB- condition, with the threshold level for significant differences where P<0.05.
While ROC analysis leads to the same conclusions and supports the superior performance of Bayesian classifiers to address our problem, no significant differences where found between the two Bayesian approaches adopted that consider features dependence.
No significant differences where found in the prevalence of SAr between the herd groups.
