The phrase "a significant difference was seen" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as research findings, statistical analysis, or comparisons where a notable change or effect is observed.
Example: "After conducting the experiment, a significant difference was seen in the results between the control group and the experimental group."
Alternatives: "a notable difference was observed" or "a meaningful difference was detected."
In contrast, when cumulus cell protein expression profiles were analysed in oocytes with the same outcome from the same patient, but originating from different ovarian hyperstimulation protocols, a significant difference was seen in the protein expression profiles.
A significant difference was seen in the proportion of patients receiving chemotherapy in the different cancer networks ranging from 8 to 24%.
A significant difference was seen for SA in the medial gastrocnemius as compared with the iliopsoas (p =.039).
A significant difference was seen in temporal difference (p < 0.01), but between-group difference was not significant.
A significant difference was seen between the two data sets for nicotine, nitrate and pH (p<0.05).
A significant difference was seen for FHB (P < 0.0001) and LB (P < 0.01) rates between embryos classified as low and medium risk.
Between-group analysis showed no significant difference in percent dilation after reactive hyperemia at 5 hours, P =.4, but a significant difference was seen after sublingual nitroglycerin, P =.02.
A significant difference is seen between the DRF of the right injured and the left non-ischemic kidneys on day 8 (Figure 2B), while for FUR, this is not the case.
A significant difference is seen in long-term distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for the patients with a low- and a high-risk 70-gene signature (DMFS p < 0.0001), as well as separately for node-negative (DMFS p < 0.0001) and node-positive patients (DMFS p = 0.0004).
Four re-cuts were seen in group A, eight re-cuts were needed in group B, and 13 re-cuts were done in group C. A statistically significant difference was seen between groups A and C (p = 0.02).
At the new bone level, a statistically significant difference was seen between group a and group b (p < 0.05).
