The phrase "a significant difference was noted" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as research findings, reports, or analyses where a notable distinction has been observed between two or more variables or groups.
Example: "In the study, a significant difference was noted between the control group and the experimental group in terms of their performance metrics."
Alternatives: "a notable difference was observed" or "a meaningful difference was detected."
Comparing the H-scores for FAK and E-cadherin between the three different tissue compartments, a significant difference was noted for mucosa versus tumor or metastasis (Additional File 3: B+C).
A significant difference was noted only in occupation of the studied women between cases and controls (p < 0.001).
A significant difference was noted in temporal difference (p < 0.05), but between-group difference was not significant.
A significant difference was noted between asthma and control groups with regard to GRB scale (P < 0.0001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.0001, respectively).
However, a significant difference was noted between the MyeloScore and the CAHP score (ROC AUC, 0.83 vs. 0.77; P = 0.02) (Fig. 2b).
When analyzing the injury severity by the fight outcome, a significant difference was noted, in that the fighters that lost were more likely to report a higher injury severity (p = .039).039
Overall, a statistically significant difference was noted in EQ-5D scores among different groups (F = 33.9, P < 0.01) and among different time points (F = 23.4, P < 0.01 after Greenhouse-Geisser correction).
A statistically significant difference was noted between the two cohorts, with a continued decrease of FMR up to 12 months being noted only in the implanted cohort.
A statistically significant difference was noted in the superior pedicle distance (SPD) between males and females at all C3 C7 levels (p value ranged 0.027 0.001); males also had larger SPD than females.
A statistically significant difference was noted for DSP, but not distance, when patients with PH were compared with those without PH.
A statistically significant difference was noted (p = 0.02), with mean SD-scores of -0.18 and -0.63 for those with and without 10-years data, respectively.
