Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a significant difference after" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the results of a study, experiment, or comparison that shows a notable change or effect following a specific event or intervention.
Example: "The analysis revealed a significant difference after the new policy was implemented, indicating its effectiveness."
Alternatives: "a notable difference following" or "a meaningful change post".
Exact(24)
This washout as quantified as tracer releasing index could reach a significant difference after 30 min of treatment.
Red blood cells show a significant difference after i/p and i/v injection (as shown in Tables 5 and 6).
It should be noted that the magnitude of time-lag values may have changed, although we did not detect a significant difference after the 2011 event.
Additionally, Michaelis Menten models were used to determine the kinetic parameters i.e. K m and V max that helped in showing a significant difference after immobilization as compared to free protease.
Eighteen of the 20 patients responded positively to levetiracetam, with a reduction of over 50% reduction in the monthly headache frequency (90% response rate) and a significant difference after treatment.
We were able to detect a significant difference after a relatively short follow-up period in the 2000 2009 group.
Similar(36)
There was no significant difference in students' understanding of midwifery care philosopy between the two groups before the study (P > 0.05), but a significant difference occurred after the study (P < 0.01).> -wrap-foot> Independent-testst (df = 104 ; CI 95%) t table = 1.65964.
Between-group analysis showed no significant difference in percent dilation after reactive hyperemia at 5 hours, P =.4, but a significant difference was seen after sublingual nitroglycerin, P =.02.
# shows a significant difference between sessions after the IS injection.
As a result, the ratio of VAT to SAT increased significantly in the ZDV/3TC/LPV/r group, but remained unchanged in the NVP/LPV/r group, resulting in a significant difference between groups after 24 months.
No bin showed a significant difference (p ≤0.05) after correction for false discovery rate [ 38].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com