The phrase "a significant correlation in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the relationship between two or more variables in research or statistical analysis.
Example: "The study found a significant correlation in the data between exercise frequency and overall health."
Alternatives: "a notable relationship in" or "a meaningful association in".
IL-1 and MMP-10 mRNA demonstrated a significant correlation in surgical degenerate samples, while TNF-α was not correlated with MMP-10 mRNA.
The Shannon diversity index was not correlated with δ18O in the southern province, although there was a significant correlation in the northern province, which shows that the general global cooling across the late Miocene appears to be related to increases in taxonomical diversity of its rodent faunas (Table 2).
Analyses of beta and PPD also confirmed a significant correlation in cooling (r = 0.22, p = 0.049 at C3) but not in heating (r = 0.15, p = 0.24 at C3) (Figs S3b and S4b in Supplementary Information).
A significant correlation in the FRs levels between the indoor and outdoor dust suggest the potential intermixing of these compounds between them.
Correlation analysis between PMV and beta amplitudes showed a significant correlation in the cooling (r = −0.23, p = 0.041 at C3) (see Fig. S1b in Supplementary Information) and a marginal significant correlation in the heating experiment (r = 0.23, p = 0.062 at C3) (see Fig. S2b in Supplementary Information).
While there was a significant correlation in the species turnover (β-diversity) of macrolichens with mosses (r2=0.21, P<0.005), the relationship was relatively poor with the woody plants.
There was also a significant correlation, in this case negative, between the quantitative levels of initial TnThs and the initial EF (p = 0.04).
However, Spearman's rank correlation test did not show a significant correlation in any of the treatment groups nor in the VEH group (rs − 0.45, p > 0.05).
Proportional errors were indicated by a significant correlation in Bland Altman plots while systematic errors were indicated by the mean difference between measurements.
Correlation coefficient, slope, and intercept of the linear fit were 0.87, 1.65, and −16.9 mL for FSVPET, and a significant correlation in Bland Altman analyses was found.
Absent correlation between 18 F-FLT uptake and the percentage of MIB-1 positive cells in FL (r = 0.15, p = 0.74) and a significant correlation in DLBCL and transformed lymphoma (r = 0.55, p = 0.03).
