The phrase "a significant comparison" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the importance or relevance of comparing two or more items, concepts, or data points.
Example: "In this study, we will make a significant comparison between the effects of the two medications on patient recovery times."
Alternatives: "an important comparison" or "a meaningful comparison".
In order to have a significant comparison, the optimal values of c and g (c* = 4.8 and g* = 2.7) are considered.
A directive for energy efficiency benchmarking has already been published, however, due to its lack of defined energy indicators, it does not allow for a significant comparison.
Since the sources of the samples and the experimental conditions are different from those found in the literature, it is quite difficult to make a significant comparison between these values.
To achieve a significant comparison, the random walk strategy is repeated several times (1,000,000 random samplings) and the distance computed is the average number of segments traveled.
A significant comparison result between eDE and DE on the IEEE 57 bus network are: execution time in seconds 364 vs. 2040, fitness value 1.933 vs. 7.91, and standard deviation of fitness value 0.018 vs. 5.52.
Furthermore, self-reports are widely used to assess individual personality traits, and this presents some methodological challenges, such as the so-called Reference Group Effect the tendency of individuals to self-report psychological issues not in absolute levels, but rather relative to a significant comparison group (Crede et al. 2010; Heine et al. 2008).
In the next section we will run larger simulations for a more significant comparison to previous work.
Since the data was not large enough to make a statistically significant comparison, this data was not used the for our analysis.
A second, and more influential, factor affecting the number of cases needed to reach a statistically significant comparison was treatment complexity.
It is important to note that both ARDS animal models were different in many aspects and do not allow for a statistically significant comparison.
A highly significant comparison effect was found for second and older parities, indicating occurrence of possible rater-introduced bias in this large multi-herd data file.
