Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a significant analysis of variance" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used in statistical contexts to refer to a method that assesses whether the means of different groups are statistically different from each other.
Example: "The researchers conducted a significant analysis of variance to determine if there were any differences in test scores among the three teaching methods."
Alternatives: "a meaningful analysis of variance" or "an important analysis of variance".
Exact(2)
A significant analysis of variance result was followed by Newman-Keuls pairwise multiple comparisons (P<.05).
A significant analysis of variance was followed by a Fisher test for multiple comparisons between groups, significance set at P < 0.05.
Similar(58)
Post hoc testing (contrast) was conducted only when preceded by significant analysis of variance effects.
The significant analysis of variance results were adjusted by post-hoc Bonferroni t test.
Differences between the percentage of records and the percentage of nUDD were statistically significant (analysis of variance, p-value 0.0038).
Quadratic fits to both halves of the data set are highly significant (analysis of variance P << 0.0001).
Differences in pretreatment CFU were not significant (analysis of variance F = 1.81, df = 4, 27, p = 0.16).
A probability value (p value) less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, using analysis of variance and Bonferroni t-tests.
Outcome scores were compared using Student t test or Tukey-Kramer Honest Significant Difference Analysis of Variance.
*Numbers in boldface indicate statistically significant differences (analysis of variance).
Based on a one-way analysis of variance, a significant difference was found between the restorative value of the urban and natural environments the most value being in the water and mountain environments and least in the urban environment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com