Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a significance difference was" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "a significant difference was"? You can use the corrected phrase when discussing statistical results or findings that indicate a meaningful difference between groups or conditions.
Example: "In the study, a significant difference was found between the control group and the experimental group, suggesting that the treatment had an effect."
Alternatives: "a meaningful difference was" or "a notable difference was".
Exact(3)
In addition, a significance difference was obtained between free-PVX and PVX-HER (P ≤ 0.001).
The only adverse effect revealing a significance difference was dry mouth reported by 14 (66.6%) patients in the fluoxetine group and 4 (23.5%) patients in the desipramine group.
In terms of a correlation with CD168 positivity at separate clinical stages, a significance difference was only found in stages II and III.
Similar(57)
A statistically significance difference was found between saccharification of HP and WS with a 73 and 81%% cellulose to glucose conversion, respectively (p value <0.05).
Only a numeric trend in favour of the active arm, but not a statistical significance difference, was found for the primary outcome of number of relapses in the entire cohort during the 18 month trial.
While no significance difference was detected between pretest scores of two groups, that there was a significant difference between two groups in favor of experimental group was seen.
However, no significance difference was observed between the two study districts as a result of difference in the degree and frequency of development interventions.
No significance difference was observed using Csq and Csq AgNps within the direct effect groups.
No significance difference was observed in the radiation levels measured for rotational procedures with and without scattering medium.
No significance difference was observed using the direct effect of 5%% Csq AgNps, where, density was recorded at 2.18 ± 0.11 cfu ml−1 compared with control.
No significance difference was defined as P>0.05.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com