The phrase "a shared point of view" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing common perspectives or opinions among a group of people.
Example: "In our discussions, we strive to find a shared point of view that everyone can agree upon."
Alternatives: "a common perspective" or "a mutual viewpoint".
But shared problems do not mean a shared point of view – at least not on matters of policing.
"An opera company is a team, a cohesive family of soloists, chorus, orchestra and backstage and administrative personnel, which brings with it a shared point of view, a richness of context, ensemble values and a nest for nurturing young artists," the letter says.
We-intentions are attitudes, but at the same time, they are not merely private, but involve a shared point of view from which the participants may critically assess each other's contributions.
We-intentions are a matter of a "shared point of view" that involves identification with a group (Sellars 1980: 101).
In his Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy Rawls tells us that "a normalization of interests attributed to the parties" is "common to social contract doctrines" and it is necessary to unify the perspectives of the different parties so as to construct a "shared point of view" (2007, 226).
In his more recent work on collective intentionality, Tuomela has generalized the idea underlying his analysis of we-intention to a differentiated conception of the socially shared point of view that underlies social and collective phenomena (see especially Tuomela 2003 and 2007).
Whether or not a situation of choice is looked at in terms of one's "private" or "shared" point of view depends on whom one takes oneself to be: a solitary individual or a group member.
The aim of Q factor analysis is to identify underlying similarities between Q sorts that represent shared points of view.
Factor analysis was used to identify shared points of view (patterns of similarity between individuals' Q sorts).
As health professionals and health information professionals received the same questionnaire, they are most easily compared and generally shared points of view for most questionnaire items.
For small or local single-user installations, the fully featured user management system can be replaced by a file-based user management which still offers the same functionalities from the sharing point of view, but lacks institute-wide functionalities.
