The phrase "a set of probabilities" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing statistical data, predictions, or outcomes in various contexts, such as mathematics, science, or decision-making.
Example: "In this experiment, we calculated a set of probabilities to determine the likelihood of each outcome occurring."
Alternatives: "a collection of probabilities" or "a group of probabilities".
Huffman codes are prefix codes and are optimum for a set of probabilities.
It would be easy for me to derive a set of probabilities that, when multiplied together, would produce a number so small that it would be statistically impossible for me to be here now writing.
Outcomes that seem, after the fact, all but inevitable — of course LeBron James hit that buzzer beater, of course the Pittsburgh Steelers won the Super Bowl — are instead treated as a set of probabilities, even after the fact.
where 𝜗 is a set of probabilities π and P(ω j |ω i ).
The basic idea is that you have a set of probabilities and attached to each probability function is an indicator of its reliability.
Because of the rules of quantum physics, there isn't a surefire, unique answer to the question of "when will this particle decay, and what will it decay into?" Instead, all we have are a set of probabilities.
Our starting point is a setting where a decision maker's uncertainty is represented by a set of probability measures, rather than a single measure.
The deterministic analog to stochastic models, a set of probability moment equations equivalent to the Chemical Master Equation (CME), offers the possibility of a priori analysis of systems without the need for computationally costly Monte Carlo simulations.
Updating a set of probability measures is done by updating the individual probability measures in the set.
The tomographic reconstruction of WDF in quantum optics is possible from the experimentally obtained data for a set of probability distributions of the light quadrature-phase amplitudes[38].
