The phrase "a set of outcome" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "a set of outcomes"? You can use the corrected phrase when referring to multiple results or consequences of a particular action or event.
Example: "The study revealed a set of outcomes that were both surprising and informative."
Alternatives: "a collection of results" or "a group of consequences".
They are best used in association with a set of outcome and performance measures that provide feedback to clinicians and allow for modification of the guidelines to meet the needs of the local patient population.
The entire PLSR procedure runs as follows (see also Figure 1): Given a set of outcome variables (Y) and a set of input variables (X) it creates new variables ("components") by adding together the input variables in X, with individual weights for each variable.
The Core Outcome Measure (COM) was first proposed as a set of outcome measures for low back pain patients [ 11].
Finally, Kranzler and colleagues (2014) conducted a set of outcome analyses using both TLFB and IVR drinking outcomes and found no differences in clinical trial results.
This implies a need for a set of outcome measures that covers all domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health ICFF) [ 34].
Instead, we collected a set of outcome measures that reflected the increase in access to screening, improved health outcomes (treated patients), acceptance of rapid testing by health professionals, quality assurance, and integration into existing programmes.
A set of outcome-based QIs were developed for long-term care settings in the US through comprehensive literature reviews, clinical panels and the comparison of facility performance and risk adjustment using a standardized dataset obtained with the interRAI Home Care (HC) and interRAI Nursing Home Care instruments [ 33].
In this paper, we identify the necessary and sufficient conditions for a set of outcomes to be inferior to another set of outcomes for every strategy.
"Finance ministers elsewhere and prime ministers elsewhere would kill for a set of outcomes such as these".
Why judge teachers narrowly on a set of outcomes that are not even predictive of their own success?
