The phrase "a set of observable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a collection of things that can be seen or measured, often in scientific or analytical contexts.
Example: "In our study, we focused on a set of observable behaviors that indicate stress in animals."
Alternatives: "a collection of observable" or "a group of observable".
A hidden Markov model (HMM) is a probabilistic finite state machine comprising a set of observable facts or observation symbols (also known as output symbols), a finite set of discrete, unobserved (hidden) states, a matrix of transition probabilities between those hidden states, and a matrix of the probabilities with which each hidden state emits an observation symbol [ 24].
The method generally assumes that properly formed theories are conjectures intended to explain a set of observable data.
The main goal of the diagnostic technique is the reconstruction of the behavior of the active system starting from a set of observable events.
These diseases are diagnosed by a set of observable criteria, and many patients show no medical evidence at all of their suffering, except the obvious development of the disease.
It grated when, last fall, Donald Trump tried to get out of paying debts by claiming that the economic meltdown was a "force majeure" — the legal equivalent, basically, of an act of God — and not a logical outcome of a set of observable circumstances.
Propensity score is the conditional probability of being employed in a changing firm given a set of observable characteristics.
This option is called 'partial value definiteness.' One way to do this is to choose, once and for, a set of observables that can be assigned definite values without running afoul of the KS theorem.
The numerator corresponds to the ratio of the estimated propensity score (widehat{{pleft( {x_{i} } right)}}) for each non-treated individual over the probability of being employed in a non-changing firm conditional on a set of observables.
But some interpreters point out that, between holding that only those observables which QM prescribes to have values[12] and holding that all of them have values, there is some leeway, namely, to propose that a set of observables, different from the one prescribed in QM (but neither, in general, more than these, nor, of course, all) have values.
This suggests that satisfying a set of readily observable 'superficial' properties is not necessary for membership of the tiger kind.
Factorial principal component analysis was first performed to select variables that mostly contributed to the principal axes, among a set of 21 observable variables with possible clinical relevance.
