The phrase "a set of biodiversity" is not correct in English.
It is typically used to refer to a collection or grouping of different species or ecosystems, but the term "biodiversity" itself does not lend itself to being quantified in this way.
Example: "The region is known for its rich biodiversity, which includes various species of plants and animals."
Alternatives: "a variety of biodiversity" or "a range of biodiversity".
To understand which species threat hotspots are driven by which consumers, we have developed a new approach to link a set of biodiversity footprint accounts to the hotspots of threatened species on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
Our aim was therefore to produce a set of biodiversity indicators that: (1) reflects all requirements for regional sustainability monitoring on the municipality level and (2) enables the derived multifaceted information to be simplified and used to improve the applicability and implementation of the system.
Therefore, we adopted a pragmatic approach to building a set of biodiversity indicators that aggregated most of the knowledge available from the ERN [14].
Because of the inconsistency in delivery of measures of biodiversity change, a set of agreed metrics of biodiversity is urgently required (2).
Designing a perfect set of biodiversity indicators might take decades [22].
Since the early 1980s, there has been much attention on developing systematic quantitative methods that use empirical biodiversity data and economic considerations to select a set of sites for biodiversity conservation.
Specifically, we focus on the distribution of areas among a set of reserves maximizing biodiversity.
A set of pressures to biodiversity (natural and artificial forestation, deforestation, agricultural abandonment and expansion, and urbanization) was obtained from reclassifying the LUCC map.
Each domain shared a set of interventions for biodiversity-based agriculture and ecological intensification that could also increase food security in the impoverished landscapes.
This work aims at contributing to this assessment through a set of major pressures to biodiversity defined from land-use and -cover changes, and evaluating their extent, distribution and correlations with geographical variables.
The authors apply the model to determine the consequences of four so-called poverty alleviation strategies: (i) intensification of production, (ii) diversification of livestock production, (iii) land expansion, and (iv) an exit from agriculture, with a set of regional poverty and biodiversity indicators.
