The phrase "a sequence would be" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing or defining a particular sequence in a mathematical, logical, or procedural context.
Example: "In this study, a sequence would be defined as a list of numbers arranged in a specific order based on a given rule."
Alternatives: "a series could be" or "a progression might be".
I think a sequence would be better, a flip book of changes.
Regardless of the DNA representation scheme, the complexity of a sequence would be revealed by fractal analysis.
We expected that while the first execution of a sequence would be rather reactive and driven by the cue, the second and third execution would rely on a learned representation of the sequence in question.
Normally, ESTs from the 5' end of a sequence would be less represented for two reasons: longer transcripts, such as for LKR/SDH, will tend to be represented by more truncated clones during the cloning process, and since mRNAs are isolated via their 3' polyA sequences, 3' coding sequences in clones will be favored.
In this analysis, multireads (i.e. those reads that matched multiple distinct sequences) were distributed randomly, and hence, the number of mapped reads to a single sequence would be only an indication of its redundancy.
A consensus sequence would be built making a note of all the observed variants at each position.
With this definition of sequence compression, a random sequence will be said to have high algorithmic complexity (it cannot be compressed to a length shorter than itself) while a repeated sequence would be of low complexity.
A typical sequence would be around 200 bp length, harbouring 40 50 bp inverted terminal repeats at its extremities.
In the simplest case, the information contained in a REP sequence would be sufficient for its recognition and cleavage by RAYT.
The existence of a seed sequence would be highly significant for the evolution of CRISPRs since it would drastically reduce the amount of sequence in the CRISPR spacer under selective constraint and allow for rapid evolution of new targets.
The results with a BIRD sequence would be similar to those of Figure 2 d, but with doublets for geminal protons, since BIRD is unable to decouple protons attached to the same C nucleus.
