a sequel of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a sequel of" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct expression is "a sequel to." Example: "The author announced a sequel to her bestselling novel, much to the delight of her fans."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Peterson, has produced a sequel, of sorts.

The New Yorker

And now The Devil's Whore has a sequel of sorts.

Independent

Though not a sequel of matter, "Wonderstruck" is very much a sequel of method, and a test of it.

The New York Times - Books

A sequel of sorts to Mr. Yip's film "S.P.L".

The New York Times

SOHO BISTRO in Rockville Centre is a sequel of sorts.

The New York Times

The trips back to the cinematic well (or chum bucket, as the case may be) include "Kung Fu Panda 2," "Paranormal Activity 3," "Scream 4," "Fast Five," and the eighth Harry Potter movie, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows (Part Two)." You might call the latter a sequel of a sequel of a sequel of a sequel of a sequel of a sequel of a sequel.

The New York Times

Mr. O'Rourke's new book, a sequel of sorts, is titled "Holidays in Heck".

The New York Times - Books

This horror collection includes a sequel of sorts to "Let the Right One In".

The New York Times - Books

Artists and Models Abroad (1938) was a sequel of a sort to Artists and Models (1937).

Encyclopedia Britannica

Buy from Amazon.com, Amazon.co.ukJOHN CASSIDY'S new book is a sequel of sorts.

The Economist

Sir Michael Caine wants to star in a sequel of 'Harry Brown'.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "a sequel to" instead of "a sequel of" for grammatically correct writing. This applies to both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "of" after "sequel". The correct preposition to indicate the relationship between a sequel and its predecessor is "to". For instance, always write "a sequel to the movie", not "a sequel of the movie".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a sequel of", while frequently found, functions incorrectly as a prepositional phrase. It aims to link a subsequent work to its predecessor, but it violates standard English grammar rules. As indicated by Ludwig, the correct form is "a sequel to".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

31%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

7%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "a sequel of" appears frequently across various sources, it's crucial to recognize that it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights that the accurate phrasing is "a sequel to". Despite its common occurrence in News & Media and Scientific contexts, its use diminishes the credibility of writing, especially in formal settings. Remember to replace "a sequel of" with grammatically sound alternatives to maintain clarity and professionalism in your communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a sequel to

This is the grammatically correct and standard alternative, indicating a continuation or follow-up.

a follow-up to

This phrase emphasizes the chronological order, suggesting something that comes after and builds upon a previous work.

a continuation of

This highlights the ongoing nature of the subject, implying an unbroken sequence from the original.

an extension of

Suggests that the new work broadens or expands upon the themes and ideas presented in the original.

a spin-off from

Implies the new work focuses on a specific aspect or character from the original, diverging into a new narrative.

a derivative of

This phrase indicates that the new work borrows heavily from the original, possibly lacking originality.

a descendant of

Suggests a lineage or direct influence from the original, often used in more abstract or conceptual contexts.

an outgrowth of

Implies that the new work naturally developed or emerged from the original as a consequence of it.

a result of

Highlights the causal relationship between the original work and the subsequent one.

a consequence of

Similar to "a result of", this emphasizes the outcome or effect of the initial work.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say "a sequel of"?

The grammatically correct way to express this is "a sequel to". The preposition "to" is used to indicate the relationship between the sequel and the original work.

What are some alternatives to saying "a sequel of"?

While "a sequel of" is incorrect, you can use phrases like "a follow-up to", "a continuation of", or "an extension of" to convey a similar meaning.

Is "a sequel of" ever correct?

No, "a sequel of" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. The correct form is always "a sequel to".

What's the difference between "a sequel of" and "a sequel to"?

"A sequel of" is grammatically incorrect. "A sequel to" is the correct phrase to use when referring to something that follows and continues from a previous work. It's the standard and accepted form.