a separate dissent

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a separate dissent" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where an individual expresses a disagreement or differing opinion that is distinct from the majority view or other dissenting opinions. Example: "In the court's decision, Justice Smith issued a separate dissent, highlighting the unique aspects of the case that warranted a different conclusion."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

16 human-written examples

The two dissenters in Martinez, Justices Scalia and Thomas, filed a separate dissent.

The New York Times

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a separate dissent.

The New York Times

Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote a separate dissent, which was joined by Justice Elena Kagan.

The New York Times

Each member of the court's conservative wing filed a separate dissent, in tones ranging from resigned dismay to bitter scorn.

The New York Times

In a separate dissent read from the bench, an unusual move indicating deep disagreement with the majority opinion, Justice Alito made a similar case in stronger language.

The New York Times

Justice Alito, in a separate dissent that seemed directed to sentencing judges, said the majority's opinion did nothing to affect even quite long fixed sentences.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

43 human-written examples

Thomas also wrote a separate dissenting opinion.

Encyclopedia Britannica

A separate dissenting opinion signed by Justices Major B. Harding and Leander J. Shaw Jr. said no faith or credibility could be placed in a count conducted under "such chaotic conditions".

The New York Times

In a separate dissenting opinion, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy declared that the ideas in the opinion had not worked and had "created a misshapen system".

The New York Times

In a separate dissenting opinion, Justice Stephen G. Breyer said that despite the lack of a formal precedent directly on the point, there was a "generation-old" understanding that people subjected to Terry stops were not required to answer any questions.

The New York Times

The lone exception was Justice Antonin Scalia, who filed a separate dissenting opinion rejecting the application of the Due Process Clause and of what he called "judicial vindication of 'parental rights' under a Constitution that does not even mention them".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When referring to legal or formal documents, ensure that the term accurately reflects a formally recorded dissenting opinion. For example: "The official transcript included "a separate dissent" from Judge Thompson.".

Common error

Avoid using "a separate dissent" when simply indicating disagreement; reserve it for documented, formal dissenting opinions. Instead of saying "He voiced "a separate dissent" during the meeting", consider "He voiced a disagreement during the meeting."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a separate dissent" functions as a noun phrase, typically acting as the subject or object of a sentence. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. The phrase denotes a formal dissenting opinion that is distinct from other dissenting viewpoints.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

75%

Wiki

12%

Encyclopedias

6%

Less common in

Science

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "a separate dissent" is a grammatically correct and commonly used noun phrase denoting a formally recorded dissenting opinion that is distinct from others. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is frequently employed in news and media to describe legal and political disagreements. Usage should be reserved for formal dissenting opinions, avoiding its application to general disagreements. Related phrases include "an independent dissenting view" or "a distinct disagreement", depending on the desired emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

an independent dissenting view

Stresses the autonomy of the viewpoint.

a divergent opinion

Emphasizes the difference in perspective.

a distinct disagreement

Emphasizes the clarity and difference of opinion.

a singular dissenting statement

Focuses on the uniqueness of the expressed dissent.

an individual objection

Focuses on the single, distinct nature of the opposition.

a unique objection

Highlights the distinctiveness and originality of the dissent.

a discrete dissenting perspective

Emphasizes the distinctness and separateness of the perspective.

a solitary protest

Highlights the isolated nature of the dissent.

a stand-alone dissenting voice

Highlights the independent and isolated nature of the dissenting opinion.

an isolated expression of disagreement

Underscores the isolated nature of the expressed disagreement.

FAQs

How is "a separate dissent" typically used in legal contexts?

In legal contexts, "a separate dissent" refers to a dissenting opinion that is distinct from other dissenting opinions in the same case, often highlighting different points of disagreement or legal reasoning.

What's the difference between "a separate dissent" and a regular disagreement?

"A separate dissent" specifically refers to a formally documented and distinct dissenting opinion, especially in legal or official contexts, while a regular disagreement is a general expression of differing opinions.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "a separate dissent"?

Use "a separate dissent" when you want to emphasize that someone's dissenting opinion is not only different from the majority but also stands apart from any other dissenting opinions presented. If you're looking for something less official, you could say "an independent dissenting view".

Are there synonyms for "a separate dissent" that maintain a formal tone?

Yes, synonyms that maintain a formal tone include "a distinct disagreement" or "a solitary protest". The best alternative depends on whether you want to emphasize the difference in opinion or the isolated nature of the dissent.